It's been rather quiet around Dodosville lately - while a new job (and a full time one at that) and what seems like endless home renovations meant to make our house less of an energy sieve have certainly cut into my writing time, there is something else as well. One of the biggest reasons I haven't written much lately is because I just plain haven't felt inspired to do so. Sure, I felt like writing about Susan Boyle and what a crock of shit the whole thing was, but then I remembered I wrote about the whole thing when the person's name was Paul Potts and I made the same point then that a million other writers did the last few weeks. And sure, I felt like writing about how absurd it is that Canada's ghg emissions are INCREASING at a higher rate than the U.S.'s and that Saskatchewan, the one freaking province who is weathering the recession rather well, is scrapping their election promise to reduce ghg emissions because is would be "a pretty huge burden on industry," but then I thought - what's the point? Nothing I write here makes a shred of difference to those in power (or those who vote mind you, because let's be honest, I'm preaching to the choir here). And there were a million other things I thought I should write about and then I realized that when it comes right down to it, I feel like I've said it all. Or at the least, I've said all I want to say at this point and time.
Sunday, May 03, 2009
Is there anything left to write?
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
7:30 PM
5
comments
Labels: Blogging
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
The Man who Allowed me to Sleep Again - A Review of The Long Descent
The peak oil world can sometimes be a very depressing world. There is no doubt that peak oil is a reality and that in my lifetime we will see consequences - the depressing part is that like all things that challenge the myth of progress, most well meaning people either A) have no idea what peak oil is, or B) if they do know what it is, stubbornly refuse to believe that it could be possible. The result is a society that is in no way, shape or form ready to take on the challenges that lay ahead.
The other depressing aspect of peak oil is the fear of a quick and nasty collapse of civilized society. As much as I realize the need for civilization to come to an end because of the destruction it causes the natural world, ourselves included, I am still very much dependent on the system. While I am far less dependent on the system than your average middle class suburban dweller, I still require the system to survive. An overnight collapse has haunted me for a long time because I know that I'm not prepared and it certainly is not because of a lack of knowledge - it's a lack of means (read - money), time and energy. Being reliant on the system means that it's hard to extricate ourselves from it.
Enter John Michael Greer, or as I call him - "The man who allowed me to sleep again." Greer is the Grand Archdruid of the Ancient Order of Druids in America, an organic gardener and author of one of my favorite blogs, the Archdruid Report. His latest book, The Long Descent: A User's Guide to the End of the Industrial Age, is a must-read for any person who thinks about peak oil and the end of civilization. What separates Greer's book from all the other's that deal with peak oil, climate change, or anti-civilization is his belief, based on history, that civilization will not end overnight:
This same pattern repeats over and over again in history. Gradual disintegration, not sudden catastrophic collapse, is the way civilizations end. On average, it takes about 250 years for a civilization to complete the process of decline to fall (27).
The core assumption to all three proposals is that there's no middle ground between preserving the modern industrial system intact and a rapid descent into primal chaos... There's a wide middle ground between contemporary society and a Road Warrior struggle of all against all. It's in the middle ground that the most likely futures of the industrial world will take shape, and aiming for a constructive response to the futures of the middle ground is in all probability the best strategy we have (128).The constructive response that Greer suggests is one that see people A) reduce their energy use as much as possible (peak oil doesn't effect those who use no oil), B) choose a profession/skill that people will need even in hard times (and one that uses little energy and simple technology), C) take care of your own health care (the industrial health care model will die a painful death with peak oil), and D) build community networks.
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
12:11 PM
4
comments
Labels: Civilization, Collapse, Peak Oil
Thursday, April 09, 2009
Mr. Future Speaks about Twitter
Sorry for the lack of substantial posts lately. Busy at work and trying to fix my house - long story that I'll share with you all soon. So instead, get a good laugh from Mr. Future and his thoughts about modern forms of communication. H/t to Canuck Guy for sending me this and giving me a good and needed laugh.
Recommend this Post
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
6:49 AM
0
comments
Monday, April 06, 2009
William Black on Wall Street Fraud
Found a great interview of William Black by Bill Moyers. Black does a great job detailing the fraud that has occurred on Wall Street, but the coverup at the political level as well. His advice - we need a major bipartisan panel to look at how we got here and uncover the fraud that has transpired. Only then will the U.S.'s economic system be fixed.
Recommend this Post
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
7:41 AM
0
comments
Labels: Economy
Saturday, April 04, 2009
All A Twitter
Everyone and their dog seems to be writing about Twitter these days and since I hate being left out (probably because when I was a fat kid I was always picked last in Dodge Ball) I need to put my two cents in. In short, I just don't get it. Well that's not true - I do get it. In a world full of self-obsessed computer addicts who replace virtual with real experience, Twitter is just the next step in our anti-social evolution. What I don't get is A) how people find enough time and exciting daily events to fill multiple tweets a day, and B) why people care about the minutiae of daily occurrences in other peoples lives. I am by no means interesting enough to fill out multiple tweets in a day. In fact, if I were to Twitter my day yesterday, it would have looked this this:
6:45 - Fuck I'm tired. Dreamt of George Bush naked again. Think I need help.
7:45 - Yum, Bran Flakes.
9:00 - At work. Drinking third cup of coffee today. It tastes like cat pee.
12:00 - Still at work. Eating a sandwich.
2:00 - Going home - ah, the life of a contract worker.
3:00 - Taking the dogs for a walk. Love picking up dog poop. No, really.
5:00 - Watching Seinfeld. Who the hell would ever waste money buying the DVDs when it's on TV 14 times a day.
6:00 - Ate dinner. Bran Flakes rock!
7:00 - Off to Yoga my week away.
10:00 - Bed time. Sleepy.
Seriously, I nearly fell asleep writing that shit. It's my life and I don't even care. Why would anyone else? Have we become so narcissistic as a society (and please, that is a rhetorical question - I know the answer), that we need to update everyone on every little detail of our lives? Do we think that we are that interesting? Do we think that people should care that much that I ate a sandwich? Do we really need more reasons to spend time on our computers and in the virtual world rather than actually sitting across from someone and telling them, in person, about our day?
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
7:11 AM
11
comments
Labels: Narcissism, Technology
Monday, March 30, 2009
Peter Schiff Was Right
Since I am not an economist (and in fact, I failed Math 11), it's been very difficult for me to figure out what the hell is going on with the economy. Everyone has their own interpretation of what's happened and what we need to do and since my understanding of all things economic is so weak, it's hard to decipher for myself who's right and who's an idiot. But like all things in this world, sometimes you need to wade thru a lot of shit in order to find out the truth and Peter Schiff seems like as close to the truth as we have. Schiff called this disaster long before anyone else did and while he was roundly mocked as being too pessimistic (sound familiar?) he was ultimately right. So if I'm going to take my cues from anyone over what's happened and what needs to be done, I think I'll go with the guy who called it from the start. So as a primer, here's a recent video of Schiff on MSNBC. For more info, I would suggest his website - Euro Pacific Capital.
I think one of the interesting things is in regards to the clips that they use to roll into the interview - people were laughing at Schiff and asking him how fun he was at parties. The message being that A) the faith people have in the system is above all else, and B) its laughable to ever suggest the system can fail. To do so makes you negative and pessimistic - its make you Mr. Mopey Pants rather than someone who looks at the reality of things, rather than the fantasy. I would rather be a Dr. Doom than an idiot with my head in the sand believing that things will always be as they were. The latter is the best way to get caught with your pants down, the former the best way to be prepared for what is about to come. Dr. Doom Peter Schiff was right - all the other talking heads were wrong. It's a lesson that we all need to learn.
(BTW - I also hate the suggestion that being a critic of civilization and warning others of its demise means that you are "no fun at parties." I am actually quite a fun person. I don't walk around all day with my hands in the pockets, head down, worrying about the end of the world. In fact, I feel great because I know that when the inevitable decline happens I will be prepared. The suggestion that I'm no fun because I engage in the dissemination of troubling information is simply a response from people who cannot let go off the fantasy that this is the "one right way to live" and that in the end, technology will save us. Calling people like Schiff doomsayers says way more about the people saying it than Schiff or anyone else in his position.)Recommend this Post
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
8:44 AM
4
comments
Labels: Collapse, Economy, Peter Schiff
Thursday, March 26, 2009
The Problem With Earth Hour
The hard facts are these: If we sum up the easy, cost-effective, eco-efficiency measures we should all embrace, the best we get is a slowing of environmental damage... Obsessing over recycling and installing a few special light bulbs won't cut it. We need to look at fundamental changes in our energy transportation and agricultural systems rather than technological tweaking on the margins, and this means changes and costs that our current and would-be leaders seem afraid to discuss.From Thomas Friedman's Hot, Flat, and Crowded
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
7:12 AM
7
comments
Labels: Climate Change, Efficiency, Environment
Monday, March 23, 2009
The Need for Compatible Solutions (or no Solutions at all)
A few weeks ago I attended a presentation on renewable energy. The gist of the evening was that given the realities of climate change, we need to find renewable and non-fossil fuel energies (and engage in a serious societal wide energy efficiency retrofit) in order to power our way of life. The presenters argued that wind was the best placed renewable source to replace oil and coal given how cheap, reliable and ubiquitous it is - sure, there are issues such as storage which need to be worked out (and yes, this is a huge issue that was glossed over by the presenters), but if you're gonna back a horse in the renewable energy race, wind is the one to get behind. While I certainly believe that there is a place for wind in our future, overall, the presentation just didn't sit right with me. Did we really want to replace all the energy we use given the problems its created for us? And by relying on wind and other renewables, weren't we just making other problems we face worse?
- Peak Oil
- Climate Change
- Overpopulation
- Environmental Degradation (this includes ecosystem destruction, species loss, and pollution)
- Personal Dysfunction
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
6:41 AM
5
comments
Labels: Alternative Energy, Civilization, Climate Change, Collapse, Depression, Dysfunction, Efficiency, Environment, Ethanol, Materialism, Moving Beyond, Peak Oil, Pollution, Population, Sustainability
Friday, March 20, 2009
George Galloway Banned From Entering Canada
One of the concerns of the crash is seeing the government or some other entity use the hardship to crack down on free speech and civil liberties. While most of us like to think of Canada as a relatively free country, we might have more to be concerned about than we think as news out of England today is that British anti-war MP George Galloway has been banned from entering Canada because of his views on the war in Afghanistan, and apparently because the Jewish Defence League doesn't like him very much. Here is the full article:
Anti-war MP George Galloway has been banned from Canada, it emerged today.Recommend this Post
A Canadian spokesman confirmed that the Respect MP had been deemed inadmissible on national security grounds and would not be allowed into the country.
Galloway today branded the ban "idiotic" and vowed to fight the ruling with "all means" at his disposal. He is due to give a speech in Toronto on 30 March.
Earlier today The Sun said border security officials had declared Galloway, 54, "inadmissible" because of his views on Afghanistan and the presence of Canadian troops there and would be turned away if he attempted to enter the country.
A spokesman for Citizenship and Immigration Canada said the decision had been taken by border security officials "based on a number of factors" in accordance with section 34(1) of the country's immigration act.
The act states:
"A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible on security grounds for:
(a) engaging in an act of espionage or an act of subversion against a democratic government, institution or process as they are understood in Canada;
(b) engaging in or instigating the subversion by force of any government;
(c) engaging in terrorism;
(d) being a danger to the security of Canada;
(e) engaging in acts of violence that would or might endanger the lives or safety of persons in Canada; or
(f) being a member of an organisation that there are reasonable grounds to believe engages, has engaged or will engage in acts referred to in paragraph (a), (b) or (c)."
Immigration minister Jason Kenney has the right to exempt people from the act if it is felt that their presence would not be "detrimental to the national interest".
But the spokesman said Kenney would "decline to exercise that discretion" in Galloway's case.
Responding to the news, Galloway issued a statements headed: "This idiotic ban shames Canada."
He is this afternoon exploring with organisers of his speaking tour and with legal advisors avenues to challenge the decision, which he branded "irrational, inexplicable and an affront to Canada's good name".
Galloway said: "This decision, gazetted in Rupert Murdoch's Sun, is a very sad day for the Canada we have known and loved – a bastion of the freedoms that supporters of the occupation of Afghanistan claim to be defending.
"This has further vindicated the anti-war movement's contention that unjust wars abroad will end up consuming the very liberties that make us who we are.
"This may be a rather desperate election ploy by a conservative government reaching the end of line, or by a minister who has not cottoned on to the fact that the George Bush era is over.
"All right-thinking Canadians, whether they agree with me over the wisdom of sending troops to Afghanistan or not, will oppose this outrageous decision.
"On a personal note – for a Scotsman to be barred from Canada is like being told to stay away from the family home.
"This is not something I'm prepared to accept."
Galloway, MP for Bethnal Green and Bow, is due to speak at a public forum entitled Resisting War from Gaza to Kandahar, hosted by Toronto Coalition to Stop the War later this month.
He is also due to speak at a second public forum in Mississauga, just west of Toronto, on 31 March.
His proposed visit prompted the Jewish Defence League of Canada to write an open letter to the country's government urging it to do "everything possible to keep this hater away".
In 2006, Galloway was refused entry to Egypt on the grounds of national security after he travelled to the country to give evidence at a "mock trial" of former prime minister Tony Blair and ex-US president George W Bush.
He was held overnight in a police cell before the authorities changed their minds and allowed him into the country.
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
7:58 AM
6
comments
Labels: Afghanistan, Censorship, Fear, War In Iraq
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Stephen Harper doesn't know what's going on with the economy
h/t to Steve at Far and Wide for this video.
Canada and the world are facing a long and deep recession that will fundamentally alter the nature of capitalism, former Bank of Canada governor David Dodge said in an exclusive interview a year after he left the bank.
Recovery “is not going to be as quick as everybody thinks,” he said on Tuesday. “I think anybody would be dreaming in Technicolor to think that you're going to get through this by the third quarter of this year” (source).
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
12:36 PM
6
comments
Labels: Economy, Stephen Harper
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
A bad day for rationality
For those of us who believe in being rational (and look to things like evidence and cause and effect), loading up the Globe and Mail's first page was a bit rough today. First off we had an article on Pope Benedict's trip to Africa, where the pope has stated in regards to condom distribution in Africa in an attempt to curb the AIDS epidemic that "[y]ou can't resolve it with the distribution of condoms...On the contrary, it increases the problem" (source). If anyone can explain to me how using condoms increases the number of people with AIDS, I'm all ears. The reality is that if the Catholic church would just endorse condoms, rather than the failure known as abstinence, the AIDS epidemic would at the very least have a chance of being dealt with.
For the next two years, certain public projects will be excused from the rigorous federal environmental assessment process in order to get Canadians working and stimulate the sluggish economy, the Conservative government announced yesterday.
Environment Minister Jim Prentice told a receptive business audience in Calgary that the move is intended to streamline the approval process, and insisted that projects won't go ahead at the expense of the environment (source).
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
10:13 AM
5
comments
Labels: Alternative Energy, Athiesm, Canada, Christianty, Civilization, Cultural Myths, Disease, Economy, Environment, Pollution, Sex, Tar Sands
Thursday, March 12, 2009
The Population Problem
All measures to thwart the degradation and destruction of our ecosystem will be useless if we do not cut population growth. By 2050, if we continue to reproduce at the current rate, the planet will have between 8 billion and 10 billion people, according to a recent U.N. forecast. This is a 50 percent increase. And yet government-commissioned reviews, such as the Stern report in Britain, do not mention the word population. Books and documentaries that deal with the climate crisis, including Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth," fail to discuss the danger of population growth. This omission is odd, given that a doubling in population, even if we cut back on the use of fossil fuels, shut down all our coal-burning power plants and build seas of wind turbines, will plunge us into an age of extinction and desolation unseen since the end of the Mesozoic era, 65 million years ago, when the dinosaurs disappeared.
- Chris Hedges in his article, Are We Breeding Ourselves to Extinction?Of all the problems that we face, there is little doubt that the issue of population will not only be the most difficult to solve but is also one that inflames the most passion. As animals we are hardwired to breed and maintain the species. Offspring are a source of pride and joy for parents, and having them is seen as one of our fundamental rights. The vast majority of us don't want to be told how many kids we can have, but the truth is that in the near future, as our population continues to soar, resources begin to dwindle ever more, and the destruction of our biosphere becomes ever more complete, there might be a time when the number of kids will be legislated.
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
6:59 AM
9
comments
Labels: Children, Civilization, Collapse, Peak Oil, Population, Sustainability
Saturday, March 07, 2009
Earth and the American Dream
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
7:03 AM
2
comments
Labels: Civilization, Collapse, Environment
Friday, March 06, 2009
What do you want to be when you grow up?
When I was a little boy I was always asked, like most little boys and girls, what I wanted to be when I grew up. For the first three or four years of my life, my answer was always the same - I wanted to be a fire-truck and the answer was always met with a round of laughter and giggles. To this day, I think it's probably the best idea I've ever had.
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
2:57 PM
5
comments
Labels: Civilization, Collapse, Work
Tuesday, March 03, 2009
The End of Cell Phones - Another reason to love the collapse
I hate cell phones. Hate them. I hate that when I go out with someone and their phone rings or they get a text, their attention moves away from me and the time we're spending with each other and moves to their phone. I'm the one who has made the effort to go out and spend time with this person, so why does the person who has gone to such great lengths to, you know, pick up a phone get priority? I honestly think that cell phones have done more to damage people's inter-personal relationships than any other technological device (well other than TV). I've read stories about young people getting together and having texting parties rather than just speaking face to face because I guess that's so 20th C. Just tonight I was out at a pub and saw three middle aged men sitting together, not saying a word, each looking at their cell phones, probably checking their e-mail or the latest sports scores. I mean, what's the point of going out then? Why not just sit at home and text each other and save the $20 for dinner.
And please, don't get me started on what cell phones and texting are doing to people's writing skills. Then there's the issue of cell phones and driving -people don't need anymore distractions than cars already give us. A few weeks ago I narrowly avoided getting t-boned my a young woman who ran a red light while talking on her cell phone. She even got bonus points for giving me the finger after I honked at her. Now I understand that cell phones have their place in society - they are great for emergencies, but we've allowed them far too prominent a place in our lives. When the crash comes (and given the financial news the last couple of days, it might come even sooner than I thought), one of the best parts might be an end, or at the very least, a downturn, in the culture of distraction that we've created with all our technological gadgetry. And I for one, can't waitRecommend this Post
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
8:38 PM
10
comments
Labels: Culture
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Shifting our expectations
What is required now is for this country to pull together, confront boldly the challenges we face, and take responsibility for our future once more....In other words, we have lived through an era where too often, short-term gains were prized over long-term prosperity; where we failed to look beyond the next payment, the next quarter, or the next election.
No, I think the biggest challenges we will face won't be technological, but personal. We as a people have taken conspicuous consumption and immediate gratification to a level Aldous Huxley almost couldn't imagine. For fifty plus years now, the people of our culture have come to expect that when they want something (and given the perverse levels of TV we watch, that's pretty fucking often), we simply walk out the door and get it. We are a people who define ourselves by what we have - our entire social system is based on the notion that the more you have, the better off you are. But as we all know, this continuous chase to keep up with the Jones', or in recent years, the Jolie-Pitt's and Winfrey's, has not only done horrific damage to our personal well-being, but to the planet and our non-human neighbours. The consumer orgy we have undertaken since the end of WWII has all been about meeting our immediate material needs and never once have we taken into account what the long-term affects of our actions will have. But as we face a warming climate, a sixth great extinction, and untold environmental destruction, the actions of the past are starting to catch up to us - they always do.
For too long the future has been ignored by the people of our culture. It has been said of traditional Aboriginal peoples that when they made decisions, they always had in mind how those decisions would impact those of the seventh generation, meaning they were conscious of the long-term implications of their actions. We're lucky if we take into account what will happen seven minutes after we make a decision. We are not great long-term thinkers - and that's where our greatest challenge will be. How do we as a people, who have been raised to think only about the present and what we can get out of it, start to worry about the future? Part of the problem is that most people can't, or won't, connect our daily actions to larger consequences (see climate change skeptics). We've lived in such a consumer/TV bubble for so long, completely disconnected from nature, that for most there is no outside world to reap the consequences of their actions. There is only them, their house, their car, their family, their TV, and their stores. But that insular world has come to an end and we need to adjust our thinking - every action and step we take from here on out must take into account the long-term consequences of those actions, whether those consequences will be faced by the land, our non-human neighbours or future human generations.
The good news is that by shifting our focus away from our immediate material gratification, maybe we humans can find our happiness again. Maybe we can re-discover that while TV is fun, real-life human beings are so much more fun. Maybe we will learn that while driving everywhere is convenient, walking or riding a bus is a great way to connect with your community. And maybe, just maybe, we can discover that the value of a person is not in what they own, but what they do for others. This transformation in our thinking won't be easy - we are literally asking people to reject every single notion they have about their life. We are asking people to think and act as if the needs of tomorrow are more important than their needs today. We should never under-estimate how tough this will be, especially if we continue to watch so much TV, a medium designed to continually convince us that we need more shit to be happy. But of all the changes we need to make, this is the most important. Without this change, all the technological solutions won't matter - sure we can produce cleaner energy, but if we continue to believe that our immediate, material needs are the most important, and in turn consume goods and rape the natural world like it's 1988 all over again, nothing will change and the future will be as bleak as we hardly dare to imagine.
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
10:01 AM
0
comments
Labels: Alternative Energy, Barrack Obama, Civilization, Climate Change Skepticism, Cultural Myths, Environment, Sustainability
Monday, February 23, 2009
So just how bad is it?

If you're like me, you probably have a lot of friends who aren't too up on the latest doomer news and believe one of the following things about the current recession: A) It's not as bad as the media is making it out to be, B) Yeah it might get bad for a bit, but by Summer or Fall we should be back on track, or C) Who cares, I have a job and it's a great time to invest in the stock market. I honestly think that with knowledge comes responsibility - whenever I hear someone I know say something like this I try and tell them, without scaring the absolute shit out of them, that perhaps they are underestimating what is happening here. As you can see from the graph above,
the current crisis is far worse at this stage than either the 90's Tech crash or the the 70's oil embargo, and not all that much better than the Great Depression. And by all accounts, things are going to get worse. A lot worse. So bad that billionaire, and chief liberal operative trying to take over the world, George Soros has said that when Lehman Bros. went down last year "[w]e witnessed the collapse of the financial system...It was placed on life support, and it's still on life support. There's no sign that we are anywhere near a bottom."
The numbers from across the world aren't pretty:
- 598,000 job losses in the U.S. in January - the biggest monthly job loss numbers in 34 years (source)
- 129,000 job losses in Canada in January (source).
- Retail sales were down 5.4% in December in Canada - the biggest decline in 15 years (source).
- Japan's GDP fell an amazing 12.7% (the annualized rates) between October and December of last year, and their economy contracted by 3.3% over the previous three months (source).
- Things in California are so bad that some government employees are getting IOU's instead of cash money and now there is some concern that tax rebates will be issued in the form of IOU's (source).
- Alberta, the juggernaut that has driven the Canadian economy for the past ten years, is now forecasting a deficit and seeing many huge projects either being put on hold or abandoned all together (source).
- And let's not forget Europe, which has already seen one countries economy collapse (Iceland) but predicting that several other, including Great Britain, could follow (source).
I'll leave the last words to the King of the Doomers, James Howard Kunstler:
Dear Mr. President, you are presiding over an epochal contraction, not a pause in the growth epic. Your assignment is to manage that contraction in a way that does not lead to world war, civil disorder or both. Among other things, contraction means that all the activities of everyday life need to be downscaled including standards of living, ranges of commerce, and levels of governance. "Consumerism" is dead. Revolving credit is dead -- at least at the scale that became normal the last thirty years. The wealth of several future generations has already been spent and there is no equity left there to re-finance.... No good, in fact, will come of a campaign to sustain the unsustainable, which is exactly what the Obama program is starting to look like. In the folder marked "unsustainable" you can file most of the artifacts, usufructs, habits, and expectations of recent American life: suburban living, credit-card spending, Happy Motoring, vacations in Las Vegas, college education for the masses, and cheap food among them. All these things are over. The public may suspect as much, but they can't admit it to themselves, and political leadership has so far declined to speak the truth about it for them -- in short, to form a useful consensus that will allow us to move forward effectively.... It's not too late for President Obama to start uttering these truths so that we can avoid a turn to fascism and get on with the real business of America's next phase of history -- living locally, working hard at things that matter, and preserving civilized culture. What a lot of us can see now staring out of the abyss is a new dark age. I don't think it's necessarily our destiny to end up that way, but these days we're not doing much to avoid it.Recommend this Post
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
1:08 PM
24
comments
Labels: Barrack Obama, Collapse, Debt, Economy, Efficiency
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Monday, February 16, 2009
Dealing With Depression
Perhaps one of the deepest, darkest secrets of industrial society is that despite a rise in income levels, levels of depression are at an all-time high. In a 2006 report published by the Centre for Economic Performance at the London School of Economics, “[a]ccording to the respected Psychiatric Morbidity Survey, [if testing were universal,] one in six of us would be diagnosed as having depression or chronic anxiety disorder, which means that one family in three is affected.” The Ontario Ministry of Health Promotion’s Healthy Ontario website states that “[a]t any given time, almost three million Canadians have serious depression.” That means that right now, around ten percent of Canadians are suffering from serious depression. These numbers are alarming on their own, but when we take into account that since the end of World War II the rates of major depressive disorders have increased ten-fold, it is clear that the problem is much more serious than many of us realize. The rates are increasing so rapidly that the World Health Organization has predicted that depression will be the second leading cause of death and disability worldwide by 2020, largely due to undiagnosed depression, a leading cause of suicide, which is becoming an epidemic in its own right.
- From my 2007 article, The Depressing Reality of Materialism, published by Briarpatch Magazine
(Note - I am not a doctor, nor do I play one on TV. The observations and suggestions in this post are the result of my experiences with depression and the extensive conversations I have had and research I have done in regards to depression. If you or someone you know is depressed, go see a doctor. Now.)
If we are to move forward and create a new and sustainable way of life, one of the first things we need to do is deal with the issue of depression. A society of depressed and dysfunctional people will not be able to undertake the massive changes we need as healthy, strong, creative and rationale people are required to make the necessary changes and right now we have very few of those. And while depression is certainly much easier to talk about these days it is still a somewhat taboo subject and one that is grossly misunderstood. Depressed people aren't weak and they don't need to suck it up. They need help and hopefully this post can help you or a loved one get the help you need.
I think this question is easiest to deal with by answering the question "what depression isn’t." Depression isn’t having a bad day or being a little down. Depression isn’t feeling a little lethargic or melancholy. Depression is a long-term feeling of uselessness, anger, mental and physical pain, fatigue, sadness, hopelessness, and overwhelming negativity. It is marked by irrationality; not only in how you act but also in how you interpret the world. It’s important to note that not all people who suffer from depression exhibit these signs – depression manifests itself differently in different people. For me personally, my depression was marked by anger – the smallest thing set me off and at times I felt I would explode with rage. Others lie in bed for days and don’t move. Others sob uncontrollably. Whatever the case, depression is incapacitating and ultimately, destructive to the person themselves and the people around them and without help, there is little they can do about it.
The truth is that we don’t really know what causes depression, but the general consensus seems to be that it is a mixture of things that can cause a person to have a depressive episode. Certainty heredity plays a part – if someone in your family has had a depressive episode, you are probably more susceptible. Life events, whether being molested or abused as a child, the death of a loved one, or daily stressful interactions, can also play a role and in many cases, trigger an episode. Drugs and alcohol are also commonly involved – whether it is as a cause or, more likely, as a coping mechanism for depression itself. More recently, evolutionary biologists like Randolph Nesse have argued that depression and depressive symptoms serve the adaptive function of stopping humans from engaging in activities that are harmful to them or of little benefit. In a 2000 article entitled “Is Depression an Adaptation?”, Nesse argued that
Some negative and passive aspects of depression may be useful because they inhibit dangerous and wasteful actions in situations characterized by committed pursuit of an unreachable goal, temptations to challenge authority, insufficient internal reserves to allow action without damage, or lack of a viable life strategy.
In a 2006 study with Matthew Keller, Nesse also found that certain negative situations aroused particular depressive symptoms. They found that people who were engaged in “failing efforts” were stricken with depressive symptoms such as “guilt, rumination, pessimism, and fatigue,” leading them to conclude that these reactions “may have been shaped by natural selection to minimize wasted effort and to re-assess failing strategies.”
My theory? Rising rates of depression are the result of engaging in an unhealthy way of life. Authors such as Tim Kasser and Juliet Schor have shown that those who are more materialistic are more susceptible to depression because they engage in activities that are of no physical or mental benefit to them – watching TV, shopping, and worrying whether you measure up to the image advertisers portray. Not only that, but the modern consumer lifestyle precludes us from doing things that we need to be healthy – spending time with others, exercise, and community service. I’ve argued that if depression really is a biological adaptation as Nesse and other suggest, that perhaps what we are seeing today with the rapid rise in rates of depression is our bodies telling us to stop engaging in a way of life that is unhealthy and harmful. Materialism as a way of life doesn't provide us with what we need as humans - in fact, it harms us physically, mentally and spiritually. Rising rates of depression are a sign that our bodies are screaming out at us to stop the madness and to try and find a new way to live, one that provides us with what us humans need.
Here’s the thing – most people who are in the middle of a depressive episode cannot get out of it by themselves. They need help. The dangerous thing about depression is that when people are in an episode they likely don’t know that they are in a depression, especially if they have never been diagnosed or had a previous episode. They know they feel terrible. They feel angry. They hate themselves. Some may even feel like ending it all – and the thing is that to them, all these feelings are completely rational and justified. Of course the reality is that they aren’t rational feelings, but there is nothing rational about depression. In fact, at its core, people with depression interpret the world and themselves in a completely irrational way. I’ve known people with depression who when they’ve thought about engaging in any activity, whether it is as mundane as leaving the house for milk or applying for a job, it will end up in disaster. Others believe that when they leave a room full of people, all those they left behind begin talking about how much they hate them. For me, if I saw a cup or plate not put away, I took it as a personal slight and a grandiose statement about how my partner felt about me. Rational people don’t act like this – depressed people do. And that’s why if you know someone who is in the middle of a depressive episode, you need to help them get help. I’ve known people who have literally dragged their partners into doctor’s offices and begged for help. My partner told me that she couldn’t live with me anymore if things continued as is – my depression not only affected me, it affected her, badly. And much like an addict, you can’t make excuses for someone in a depression – you can’t enable their behavior. They need help. Get them to a doctor anyway you can. Their life may depend on it.
The big issue with depression is whether or not medication should be used. Now again, I’m not a doctor so really, if you have depression talk to your doctor about this. They are much more knowledgeable about it than I am. But since this is my blog and my post, I will tell you what I think. It’s pretty clear that anti-depressants are being prescribed as solutions to depression and that's wrong. While some people may forever need anti-depressants in order to cope with their depression, most should be able to live a normal life without. This doesn’t mean that anti-depressants shouldn’t play a role in helping people deal with depression and ultimately, change their lives. I took anti-depressants as part of a larger program to help me - my belief is that anti-depressants are needed to A) get people out of their depression, and B) help them learn the techniques they need to combat their depression and hopefully, avoid future episodes. I saw anti-depressants as a tool – a means to an end, not an end in and of itself. If all your doctor does is prescribe anti-depressants then you probably need to find a new doctor.
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
8:05 AM
10
comments
Labels: Civilization, Depression
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Calvin the Soothsayer
Found this on Reddit this morning - who knew that Calvin and Hobbes was the place to go for critique's of civilization, especially since it was penned 15 years ago. Enjoy.
Recommend this Post
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
10:13 AM
0
comments
Labels: Civilization, Collapse, Economy
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
A Dodosville Milestone - 400 Posts
As with most people, there have been several moments in my life that have changed the course of my existence. When I was in Grade 9, I snuck out of basketball tryouts (namely because I was scared I wouldn't make the team, and, um, I sucked) and as a result, never became the shortest starting PF in the history of the NBA. When I was 24 and on a road trip through the U.S., my friend Greg Williams and I narrowly avoided a tragic accident that took the lives of four people and as a result, I went back home to Vancouver, questioned what the fuck I was doing with my life, quit my lucrative job in the video game industry, and went back to school which helped launch me on my journey to explore and critique civilization. When I was 33, after returning home from a friends wedding overseas and in the midst of the worst depressive episode of my life, I finally, at the insistence of my wonderful partner, went and dealt with my depression and as a result, avoided alienating and losing everyone I loved, including myself. And on February 22nd, 2005, I started this blog.
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
11:20 AM
10
comments
Labels: Alternative Energy, Basketball, Blogging, Civilization, Collapse, Debt, Depression, Economy, Efficiency, Environment, Hope, Marijuana, Moving Beyond, Work
Thursday, February 05, 2009
A Better Day Will Come
We live in tough times. People are being laid off left and right. Our economy and way of life is collapsing around us. Depression and suicide rates continue to skyrocket and suffering as a whole, in the human and non-human worlds, continues unabated. And as our world falls apart around us, that suffering will only increase. People will die and buildings will burn as civilization and its proponents try and keep this sinking ship afloat. But while things look dark now, I have hope that a better day will come. A day when people aren't burdened by the ridiculous demands of an out of control materialistic system. A day when people will live closer to nature and don't exploit it into extinction in order to make a buck. A day when people stop hating themselves because they don't look like those they see on TV. A day when the land isn't forced to endure the destruction we heap upon it. A day when people will live in real communities and have real relationships with healthy people and as a result, be healthy themselves. I really do have hope that one day this demeaning and destructive existence will come to an end and our fellow beings, human and otherwise, can find a better way. We have to have that hope, because without it, what will this struggle be for? Recommend this Post
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
8:54 PM
3
comments
Labels: Civilization, Collapse, Hope
Monday, February 02, 2009
Why we are doomed.
From Consumer Energy Reports:
Sure, oil prices are down - some believe that it is a lack of credit and a drop in demand that has created the drop in oil prices. Whatever the case, low oil prices don't mean that peak oil is a myth. If anything, low oil prices will only hasten peak oil because those low prices mean that certain alternative oils, such as those found in the oil and tar sands, are not worth digging out of the ground because it costs more to develop them than to sell them. Whatever the case, the fact that SUV sales are up highlight A) how incredibly stupid some of our fellow civilized humans are, and B) what a short memory people have. I remember listening to the radio when oil prices were at their peak and a local car retailer bluntly said, "people will forever buy cars now with $1.50 a liter gas prices in mind." I assumed the same. Both of us were wrong. It is probably the one time in my recent life where I have given the benefit of the doubt to others and now I know why I don't do it more.The recent fall in gas prices is spurring consumers to once again begin purchasing large cars and SUV’s, according to Chrysler President Jim Press.
When gas was selling for above $4 a gallon back in July of last year, customers started becoming more aware of the miles per gallon achieved by the vehicle they were intending to buy which in turn caused growth in the small car market.
But now, with gas prices falling below $2 a gallon nationally, the market for large cars is back once again.
The recent swing “shows the fickleness of the market,” says Press, speaking after a J.D. Power and Associates conference for auto dealers in New Orleans.
While Chrysler decided to phase out the company’s full-size Dodge Durango SUV after gas prices skyrocketed, Press says that the vehicle is currently in the shortest supply among all the vehicles sold by Chrysler.
Hybrid sales plunged 43 percent in December and 50 percent in November, according to the auto Web site edmunds.com. Toyota’s Prius, the top-selling hybrid in the U.S., tumbled 45 percent in December, while sales of Nissan Motor Co.’s Altima hybrid fell a whopping 70 percent.
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
8:14 PM
8
comments
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
The Boondoggle Budget
Economic collapse has a way of turning economic negatives into positives. It is not necessary for the United States to embrace the tenets of command economy and central planning to match the Soviet lackluster performance in this area. We have our own methods that are working almost as well. I call them “boondoggles.” They are solutions to problems that result in more severe problems than those they attempt to solve.
Now before I go into specifics, let me frame the debate here - I do not believe that any economy is sustainable if it is based on A) the belief in perpetual growth, B) the exploitation of everything and anything not nailed down for profit, and C) the use of non-renewable resources that are warming the climate and whose supplies are peaking. As a society we need to, at all costs, develop a sustainable economy that is localized, based upon the use of renewable resources, does not have as its main tenet "profit at all costs," and which doesn't destroy the environment we live in or the species we share this planet with. Any money, in my opinion, thrown at the former rather than the latter will do nothing to solve our problems simply because they can't be solved. You can't make the unsustainable sustainable by wishing really hard and putting more money into it. It's an impossibility.
So what did yesterday's budget offer Canadians and our collapsing economy (all quotes are from the Globe and Mail)?
- A $20-billion cut to personal income taxes, increasing the basic personal amount and top of the two lowest income tax brackets by 7.5 per cent - while I always like having more money in my pocket, the theory behind tax cuts is that with people having more money they will buy more stuff and that will save the economy. Buying more stuff will only result in more damage to the natural world, increased ghg emissions, and more stores being built. While these tax cuts might prop up some businesses in the short-term, they do not address the long term problems with our current economic system.
- Home Renovation Tax Credit, offering $1,350 in tax relief for home renovations - I wouldn't mind this part of the budget if the government had placed a caveat on it - the home renovations must improve your homes heat and energy efficiency. Our current housing model of huge single family dwellings that use way too much energy and heat is unsustainable - why give people money back if they are only going to renovate their kitchen for the third time in six years?
- An additional $50-billion to the Insured Mortgage Purchase Program and First-time home buyers to get up to $750 in tax relief - The current model of single family dwellings in ever-increasing suburban sprawl is not sustainable in a world with dwindling resources such as oil and gas and no alternative energy ready to take its place. We don't need more homes that follow the status quo. We need smarter city designs that allow people to use their cars less and that use space better.
- Almost $12-billion in new project funding over two years, including a $4-billion fund for shared-cost projects with provinces and municipalities to repair roads other infrastructure. The government will also create a $500-million fund for recreational facilities like hockey arenas. Projects include improvements to the Montreal-Ottawa-Toronto rail corridor; repairing Montreal's Champlain bridge, twinning a section of the Trans-Canada Highway through Banff National Park; improvements to the Sarnia and Fort Erie border crossings - Growth, growth, and more growth. Build more stuff, that will save us, especially in a world of shrinking non-renewable resources that warm the climate. I especially love the idea of twinning the Trans-Canada in Banff National Park. Yes, let's destroy more of the remaining habitat of our non-human neighbours. Also, we don't need to repair roads - we need to dismantle them. As James Kunstler is fond of saying - "the days of happy motoring are over." The car culture will die, hybrid plug in or not. Why not take the 12 billion and invest it in rails and mass transit? We're going to need it anyways, so why not start now.
- New disclosure rules and a minimum grace period on credit cards - Exactly what we need - to make it easier for people to use their credit cards. Have we learned nothing? The problem we face is partially because of the ease with which we can access credit and as a result, overextend ourselves. We need to learn to live within our means, not make it easier to buy whatever the TV tells us too.
- Offering short-term repayable loans to the industry and Create a $12-billion credit facility to support vehicle and equipment financing - Do I really need to comment on this one? The auto industry is dying. Let it die.
- $170-million over two years for Forestry and Mineral exploration tax credit extended by one year - How many trees can we really cut down? How much more of the earth can we lop off to find minerals?
- $350-million over two years for Atomic Energy Canada Ltd, and Accelerated write-offs for companies that invest in carbon capture and storage technology - The very definition of boondoggle. We use too much energy and produce too many ghg emissions and other pollutants. The prudent thing to do is powerdown to a level where some alternative energy sources can be used. Carbon capture is not a solution. Nuclear energy comes with its own problems, both in terms of storing its waste and the fact that uranium is one of those peaking resources.
- New Clean Energy Fund, to generate more than $2.5-billion in investments and New $1-billion green infrastructure fund, including transmission lines to connect renewable energy projects - While at first glance these seem like good things, apparently the New Clean Energy fund is mostly directed at carbon capture and storage. And one billion for Green infrastructure? One billion?
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
1:26 PM
6
comments
Labels: Alternative Energy, Canada, Collapse, Debt, Economy, Efficiency, Environment, Materialism, Peak Oil, Suburbia, Sustainability
Friday, January 23, 2009
Things America can apologize for...
We will not apologize for our way of life, nor will we waver in its defense, and for those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents, we say to you now that our spirit is stronger and cannot be broken; you cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you.- President Barrack Obama in his inaugural address
- To the indigenous peoples of the Americas the U.S. can apologize for the systematic destruction of their lands, their people, and their way of life. The U.S. waged war on Indigenous peoples for two hundred plus years, forcibly moving them off their lands, putting a price on their scalps, destroying their food base (the bison), and breaking so many treaties that it boggles the mind.
- To the land itself the U.S. can apologize for hacking down millions of acres of trees, damming thousands of rivers, polluting countless lakes and rivers, and sucking the life out of millions of acres of once fertile soil.
- To the non-human animals we share this land with the U.S. can apologize for destroying their land base, polluting and damming their rivers, keeping them in confined cages, and slaughtering them by the millions and sending thousands into extinction.
- To the numerous countries that the U.S. has interfered in order to further their national interests, the U.S. can apologize for the pain and suffering that interference has caused them (see Iran in 1953).
- To the people of countries like Saudi Arabia, the U.S. can apologize for supporting their dictators and population, many of whom want to kill Americans, with their vast oil purchases.
- To the people of Iraq the U.S. can apologize for supporting Saddam Hussein in the 1980s, supporting a destructive embargo in the 90's and early 21st C, then invading their country with absolutely zero evidence that they were a threat to anyone and having no plan for the postwar invasion, which ultimately led to the death of hundreds of thousands of innocent people.
- To the millions of people who the U.S. has put in jail for possession of a simple weed, many of whom need it to reduce their pain. Bonus points for spending billions on this useless endeavor and then calling themselves the land of the free.
- For promoting a way of life so destructive and unsustainable and exporting it, sometimes by force (see Naomi Klein's Shock Doctrine), to nearly every corner of the planet. Extra bonus points for saying you don't have to apologize for it. Ever.
Posted by
Peter Dodson
at
10:37 AM
4
comments
Labels: Barrack Obama, Civilization, Colonization, Environment, First Nations, Marijuana, Sustainability




